‘Topping’ from the ‘bottom’?
Add Reply
As a switch who has been in the lifestyle for over 20 years I know that the true definition of topping from the bottom would be when the submissive is giving orders (or trying to at least) to the Dominant such as when being spanked and telling the Dominant to do it harder. Thus they are topping from the bottom, although the previous 2 examples could be cited as accurate the Dominant is NEVER a bottom./images/_common/forums/emoticons/' }
VsKarly
10/3/16, 2:45pm
| Post #1
Forum Rookie
View: My profile
Topping from the bottom is a concept or phrase that receives a lot of criticism from the community; some kinksters look at it in a positive light while others reject the concept entirely. So what is Topping from the bottom?
Example 1: Consent and negotiation are compelte. A Mistress bends over the kitchen counter and instructs her submissive to paddle her ass with nice long, deep thuddy strokes. Here, the Mistress is taking the traditional position of the bottom (i.e. receiving spanks) and the bottom is taking the traditional role of the Top (i.e. giving spanks) BUT the Mistress is still in control of the scene (i.e. commanding the spanks to be given). So the Mistress is ‘Topping’ from the ‘bottom’. Another example could be when a Mistress instructs her sub to give her a foot massage.
Example 2: Consent and negotiation are complete. The Mistress instructs her sub to clean and complete necessary chores within the house, like discussed. The sub back talks his Mistress, refusing to do the chores on the grounds that he just doesn’t want to, even after he’s already negotiated to worship and serve her. This could also be considered ‘Topping’ from the ‘bottom’ because the submissive is attempting to control the scene even after negotiating his servitude to the Mistress. In this light, Topping from the bottom is seen as a criticism of an unruly submissive.
What is your opinion on ‘Topping’ from the ‘bottom’? Do you approve of the idea? Why or why not? Do you have a different definition? Please share with us your thoughts on this kinky concept
/images/_common/forums/emoticons/' }
Example 1: Consent and negotiation are compelte. A Mistress bends over the kitchen counter and instructs her submissive to paddle her ass with nice long, deep thuddy strokes. Here, the Mistress is taking the traditional position of the bottom (i.e. receiving spanks) and the bottom is taking the traditional role of the Top (i.e. giving spanks) BUT the Mistress is still in control of the scene (i.e. commanding the spanks to be given). So the Mistress is ‘Topping’ from the ‘bottom’. Another example could be when a Mistress instructs her sub to give her a foot massage.
Example 2: Consent and negotiation are complete. The Mistress instructs her sub to clean and complete necessary chores within the house, like discussed. The sub back talks his Mistress, refusing to do the chores on the grounds that he just doesn’t want to, even after he’s already negotiated to worship and serve her. This could also be considered ‘Topping’ from the ‘bottom’ because the submissive is attempting to control the scene even after negotiating his servitude to the Mistress. In this light, Topping from the bottom is seen as a criticism of an unruly submissive.
What is your opinion on ‘Topping’ from the ‘bottom’? Do you approve of the idea? Why or why not? Do you have a different definition? Please share with us your thoughts on this kinky concept
/images/_common/forums/emoticons/' }
Kinky Queen
10/4/16, 1:50pm
| Post #2
PERFORMER
I like example 1 I'm a switch and there's times when I'm dominating delivering spanks and then get turned on and instruct my sub to give me some spankings as well, if they do a bad job, I'll switch back and deliver harder spanks. I don't like unruly subs as mentioned in example 2, that's a good way to give away your sub spot to someone more deserving, I don't like time wasters, my orgasms are more important than yours
/images/_common/forums/emoticons/' }
/images/_common/forums/emoticons/' }
ChrisDK
10/4/16, 3:09pm
| Post #3
I like both concepts 
. I like to be allowed to be adventurous 
.
More so, I love to be a bit rebellish and to provoke my master's anger. Love to resist and then beg even more for my desires./images/_common/forums/emoticons/' }
. I like to be allowed to be adventurous .More so, I love to be a bit rebellish and to provoke my master's anger. Love to resist and then beg even more for my desires./images/_common/forums/emoticons/' }
Emery Vox
4/28/17, 3:04am
| Post #4
PERFORMER
I definitely agree with Kinky Queen, as a switch I'm a fan of the first example. As a bit of a brat, I'm okay with example 2 ONLY if the top has given their consent to bratty behavior in advance (essentially, planning for a funishment scene). As a top if I haven't told my sub that they can be bratty that day their either getting a serious punishment or kicked to the curb.
/images/_common/forums/emoticons/' }
/images/_common/forums/emoticons/' }
subprincess2MissL
7/12/17, 5:14pm
| Post #5
As a switch who has been in the lifestyle for over 20 years I know that the true definition of topping from the bottom would be when the submissive is giving orders (or trying to at least) to the Dominant such as when being spanked and telling the Dominant to do it harder. Thus they are topping from the bottom, although the previous 2 examples could be cited as accurate the Dominant is NEVER a bottom./images/_common/forums/emoticons/' }
